The government鈥檚 plans for dealing with Covid-19 rent arrears 鈥 some more details emerge
Last week, the government published a policy statement to deal with rent arrears accrued during the pandemic for those businesses affected by the pandemic.
Please note: the information contained in this legal update is correct as of the original date of publication.
We mentioned in our article of 17 June (click here) that the government will bring in legislation to deal with rent arrears accrued during the pandemic for those businesses affected by the pandemic.
Last week, the government published a policy statement giving a bit more detail about its plans. The following key points emerge:
- The legislation will ring-fence rent arrears accrued from March 2020 for tenants affected by Covid-19 business closures until restrictions for their sector are lifted. It will also introduce a system of binding arbitration where landlords and tenants cannot agree how to deal with those arrears.
- Ahead of the legislation being passed, the government will publish the key principles that it will seek to put in place in a revised Code of Practice (the initial voluntary Code to encourage landlords and tenants to work together to protect viable businesses was published in June last year). This will allow landlords and tenants time to negotiate in good faith using the principles set out in the updated Code.
- The restriction on landlords forfeiting any business lease for non-payment of rent will continue until 25 March 2022, unless the legislation is passed before then. Once the legislation is passed, the restriction on forfeiture will only apply to ring-fenced arrears. Landlords will therefore be able to forfeit for arrears accrued prior to March 2020 and after the end of the period of trading restrictions for the sector in question. They will also be able to forfeit for non-payment of rent accrued at any time where the tenant鈥檚 business falls outside the scope of the new legislation.
- Tenants who have not been forced to close during the pandemic and who have the means to pay rent, should do so. In addition, tenants should begin paying rent from the point that trading restrictions for their sector are lifted (unless otherwise agreed with their landlord).
- The government expects landlords and tenants to agree terms to defer or waive an appropriate proportion of the ring-fenced arrears. It expects landlords to share the financial burden with tenants where they are able to do so and that tenants who can pay should do so.
- Further details on the arbitration process and how it will work will be provided in due course. It should be seen as a last resort - the government鈥檚 strong preference is for landlords and tenants to reach agreement themselves using the principles set out in the revised Code of Practice. If one party is found not to have negotiated in the spirt of these principles, an arbitrator may be able to require that party to meet all the costs of the arbitration.
So, a bit more detail, but many questions remain to be answered. For example:
- How will the arbitration process affect the two High Court decisions earlier this year which confirmed that tenants remain bound to pay their rent in full despite the pandemic?
- Will landlords be prevented from pursuing guarantors for all the ring-fenced arrears or from drawing down on a rent deposit to recover those arrears?
- Will the legislation affect a tenant鈥檚 ability to exercise a break clause which is conditional on paying all rent due under a lease (including all the ring-fenced arrears)?
- How will the government ensure a consistency of approach amongst arbitrators?
- What financial information will tenants be expected to provide to arbitrators to show the financial impact of the pandemic on their business?
- Will the legislation benefit tenants who were not forced to close entirely during the pandemic, but for whom turnover was severely affected (e.g. restaurants who were able to provide takeaways only)?
No doubt answers to these (and many other) questions will be provided in the weeks and months ahead. For now, we can only watch and wait!
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
澳门六合彩资料
ASA bans 鈥渕isleading鈥 Huel and ZOE ads endorsed by Dragon鈥檚 Den Star
Opinion
Choose your words wisely: Balancing inclusivity and employees鈥 beliefs at work
Guide
Guidance for manufacturers of EVs and HEVs in the UK: ASA's non-exhaustive electric vehicle advertising guidance
澳门六合彩资料
(Deep)fake it till you make it? The ASA's role in regulating false celebrity endorsements
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 strengthens Irish Corporate team with appointment of Principal Associate James Byrne
澳门六合彩资料
The benefits of good governance in sport
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 to lead discussions on the future of real estate and infrastructure at this year鈥檚 UKREiiF 2024 event
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 acquires business of real estate practitioner Paul Taylor Solicitors
澳门六合彩资料
The Baltimore bridge collapse: One of the biggest losses in maritime insurance history?
澳门六合彩资料
Understanding the ICO's new fining guidance
澳门六合彩资料
Unravelling the challenges and opportunities in UK sports governance
澳门六合彩资料
ASA ruling on Calvin Klein FKA Twigs advertisement
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 successful for National Lottery in Court of Appeal
Opinion
Caregivers at work: Navigating new carer's leave regulations
Opinion
EHRC publishes new guidance on menopause and the workplace
Opinion
BBC personality wins appeal on IR35 status
澳门六合彩资料
Covid BI litigation (Autumn 2023): Insurance coverage disputes update
澳门六合彩资料
COP28 - how to limit and prepare for future climate change
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 advise Maven Equity Finance on investment in Traverse Associates
Press Release
Three strong restructuring and insolvency team join 澳门六合彩资料
Podcast
The real estate podcast: How AI and tech is changing real estate
澳门六合彩资料
How to negotiate better 鈥榞reen鈥 provisions in your leases
Opinion
The Metaverse's influence on real estate: Implications for commercial retail clients and law firms
Guide
How to manage retail sector supply contracts and avoid disputes
澳门六合彩资料
Utilising prime retail sites to improve the health of our nation
澳门六合彩资料
A new era of opportunity for high street regeneration?
Opinion
Practical points from High Court ruling that Tesco has infringed Lidl鈥檚 IP rights in its famous yellow circle logo
Press Release
Corporate dealmakers advise Sodexo Live! on its move to 100% stake in global sports, travel and hospitality provider STH
澳门六合彩资料
Pitfalls for retailers to avoid when offering access to 鈥榖uy now, pay later鈥 products
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料鈥檚 Manchester dealmakers advise Spatial Global on its acquisition of Heathrow based freight specialist Hollyport Logistics
Opinion
Supreme court rules on retail tenant's service charge bill
Published Article - Consumer Duty
Consumer duty part 3 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料鈥檚 retail lawyers advise Wilko on its strategic 拢48m sale and leaseback of Nottinghamshire distribution centre to DHL
Press Release
Suzanne Harlow joins 澳门六合彩资料 as Non-Executive Director
Law firm 澳门六合彩资料 is pleased to announce that Suzanne Harlow has been appointed Non-Executive Director of its Retail, Consumer & Logistics sector.
澳门六合彩资料
Fashion retailers: Is this the end for free returns?
Published Article
AI generated designs on retail products
Every AI will have its own terms of use. DALL路E 2鈥檚 Terms of Use dated 3 November 2022 specify that as between a user and Open AI, a user owns their prompts and uploads. Open AI also assigns to the user all rights in any images generated by DALL路E 2 for that user (subject to the user complying with those Terms of Use, and to a licence to use inputs and output to develop and improve the services).
Published Article - Consumer Duty
Consumer duty part 2 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
Published Article
Luxury brands and sustainability: The challenges and solutions
澳门六合彩资料
The Retained EU Law
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the 鈥淏ill鈥).