Forced academisation and school intervention
We know that many schools and trusts feel vulnerable in the current climate of forced academisation and school interventions, and often receive mixed messages regarding their legal position. Our lawyers make the complex simple, offering clear and strategic advice which enables governors to secure the right path to improvement for their school.
Current education policy carries an expectation that formal intervention powers are used to tackle ‘schools causing concern’.
For maintained schools, there are well-established intervention measures available to local authorities, such as issuing a warning notice or imposing an interim executive board (IEB). In addition, the Secretary of State has a range of intervention powers and, in certain circumstances, can make an academy order without a governing body’s consent. This includes where a school is graded inadequate by Ofsted or is designated as a ‘school not making necessary improvements’ under the Coasting School regulations.
For academies, both legislation and the terms of the funding agreement grant powers exercisable by the Regional Directors to take intervention steps where academies are causing concern. This includes the discretionary power to intervene in academies not making necessary improvements. The ESFA also has rights to intervene in cases of financial mismanagement or weaknesses in governance.
Our expert education lawyers have an established track record of supporting governing bodies and trust boards with responding to the full range of intervention measures.
What we do...
- Understanding when you are ‘eligible for intervention’.
- Understanding鈥痽our legal position鈥痠f you are receiving external pressure to become an academy.
- Advising on responding to a threat of re-brokerage of your academy.
- Responding to Notices to Improve from the ESFA.
- Responding to Termination Warning Notices from the Regional Director.
- Challenging Ofsted鈥痳eports.
- Responding to a proposal鈥痶o put in place an IEB.
- Judicial review鈥痮f school intervention decisions.
- Advising on and鈥痗hallenging warning notices鈥痠ssued by the local authority or Regional Director.
鈥淭he education team at 澳门六合彩资料 are one of best legal teams I have worked with in my career. It is not often you find a team that listens to their client, demystifies the law and enables you to take well informed decisions for the benefit of your organisation that stands the test of time.鈥
Featured experience
Challenging forced academisation
Following an Ofsted judgement of special measures, we supported a school to resist forced academisation. When they came to us for support, we prepared a robust and well-timed letter to the DfE to demonstrate how, in light of the improvement made by the school during this period, forced academisation would be irrational to the point of being unlawful. Subsequently, the school was re-inspected and judged to be 鈥榞ood鈥 by Ofsted, meaning it was no longer eligible for intervention and safe from forced academisation.
Yew Tree Primary School
Advising Yew Tree Primary School in a landmark judicial review case against the Secretary of State for Education, arguing that the Secretary of State鈥檚 decision not to revoke the school鈥檚 academy order was unlawful.
A single academy trust
Advising a single academy trust on a judicial review case against the Secretary of State for Education challenging decision-making relating to the proposed re-brokerage and the chosen 鈥榮ponsor鈥. During the course of proceedings, the Secretary of State agreed to revoke the termination notice.
A primary school
Advising a primary school on responding to a warning notice issued by their local authority on the grounds that there had been a breakdown in governance at the school. We identified a number of ways in which the warning notice was flawed, and the local authority agreed to take no further action. As a result, the school did not become eligible for intervention and did not become vulnerable to further school intervention measures, such as the imposition of an IEB or an academy order.
Expertise
Summary evaluations of multi-academy trusts
Resource
"The scrutiny of MAT performance by Ofsted has recently undergone some operational changes. The regime has been replaced by “MAT summary evaluations”. In this guide, we comment on the revised approach and identify a number of key elements for MATs to reflect on."Read more
Converting to academy status
Product
"By combining the best lawyers specialising in education law with an affordable fixed fee, we ensure the process is straightforward."Find out more
Testimonials
"澳门六合彩资料 has a very clear service ethos and goes the extra mile to ensure complete satisfaction. Partners and associates are knowledgable, professional and caring. The breadth of experience across the team means that no query goes unanswered. Notwithstanding much home-working this last year, business has carried on ‘as normal."
"The team are professional and are always willing to go the extra mile to offer support and guidance. We have developed strong and effective working relationships."
Key contacts
Katie Michelon
Partner
You may be interested in...
澳门六合彩资料
New practical guidance on challenging Ofsted inspections
澳门六合彩资料
What will the new RISE Scheme mean for schools and academy trusts?
Guide
New guidance for intervention in schools
澳门六合彩资料
Ofsted and intervention changes
Press Release
Comments on the publication of Ofsted鈥檚 new school inspection handbook
Press Release
King鈥檚 Speech 2024: Reaction from 澳门六合彩资料 lawyers
Guide
Revisions to Ofsted鈥檚 complaints procedure: what you need to know
澳门六合彩资料
Ofsted reform: Where are we now and where do we go from here?
澳门六合彩资料
Inspector conduct 鈥 what will Ofsted do about it?
Press Release
Half of school leaders think Ofsted does not have the expertise for Multi-Academy Trust inspections, according to new survey
澳门六合彩资料
School leaders 鈥 share your views on the issues of the day
澳门六合彩资料
An update on Ofsted鈥檚 early monitoring programme: ineffective safeguarding
澳门六合彩资料
The role of Ofsted in school complaints
澳门六合彩资料
Safeguarding judgements and school intervention
澳门六合彩资料
A commentary on the Ofsted complaints procedure consultation
澳门六合彩资料
How multi-academy trusts are involved in school inspections
澳门六合彩资料
The Schools Bill 鈥 law no more
In July, we published an update on the Schools Bill with the news that the proposed legislation relating to new academy standards and extended intervention powers for academy trusts would be removed. Last week, we received broader news of the dropping of the Bill, with education secretary Gillian Keegan announcing that it will not reach its third reading in the House of Lords.Press Release
Law firm picks up record breaking sixth Education Investor Award
澳门六合彩资料鈥檚 education team has been named as winner of the 鈥楲egal Advisors to Education Institutions鈥 category at the Education Investor Awards 2022 for a record sixth time.
Press Release
Thousands take part in virtual careers event to help increase diversity in the legal profession
Over 3000 young people from across the UK and Ireland took part in a virtual legal careers insight event, aimed at making the legal profession more diverse.
澳门六合彩资料
Updated guidance on coasting school intervention process
In this article we set out the criteria, expectations and support schools should consider if notified they fall within this new category.
澳门六合彩资料
澳门六合彩资料鈥檚 market leading Education expertise recognised again in latest Legal 500 rankings
The new set of Legal 500 directory rankings have been published and we are proud to once again be recognised as one of the country鈥檚 leading firms advising the Education sector.
澳门六合彩资料
Schools Bill and intervention powers - an update
We provide an update on the Schools Bill proposed legislation & it's impact on academy trusts.
澳门六合彩资料
Academy Intervention Powers
Part 1 of the Schools Bill introduces statutory rights designed to ensure that the Secretary of State has efficient oversight and is equipped to address 鈥渋nstances of failure鈥 in academy trusts.
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料鈥檚 C-suite exec level coaching team appoints two new education specialists
National law firm 澳门六合彩资料 has grown its team behind its dedicated Space + Time executive coaching programme with the addition of two more qualified coaches who will work with clients in the education sector.
澳门六合彩资料
The return of Ofsted inspections
Omicron may have brought Ofsted inspections to a pause in December, but most of the autumn term was a busy period for the non-ministerial department, with a return to a full schedule of inspections and the targeted inspection of schools formerly exempt.
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 hosts UK鈥檚 largest virtual legal careers event to boost access to careers in law
Press Release
New benchmarking service now available to guide the remuneration of school trust executive teams
The Confederation of School Trusts (CST), as the sector body for School Trusts, today releases a salary benchmarking service for executive roles in School Trusts, in conjunction with partners XpertHR, Cendex and 澳门六合彩资料.
澳门六合彩资料
Bill introduced to Parliament to enable Ofsted to have powers to inspect MATs
A former teacher and MP on the current Commons Education Select Committee, Jonathan Gullis, has introduced a bill to give Ofsted the power to inspect Multi Academy Trusts (MATs).
澳门六合彩资料
Successful challenge to Secretary of State鈥檚 refusal to revoke directive academy order
Our client, Yew Tree Primary School, challenged the Secretary of State for Education鈥檚 (SSE) decision not to revoke a directive Academy Order.
澳门六合彩资料
Summary evaluations of multi-academy trusts
Opinion
Another Ofsted investigation resulting in prosecution 鈥 Independent school in Lincolnshire found operating illegally
Opinion
Second prosecution of its kind following Ofsted investigation for running an illegal school
A Head Teacher and her father were convicted at Westminster Magistrates鈥 Court for running an unregistered private school in Streatham.
澳门六合彩资料
Ofsted v Durand - outcome of the appeal
In 2017, we wrote about Durand Academy Trust鈥檚 (鈥淒urand鈥) case against Ofsted and the High Court鈥檚 decision that Ofsted鈥檚 complaints procedure was unfair for those schools judged to require special measures or have serious weaknesses.