Restrictions on landlords鈥 remedies extended again and extra protection to be given to certain businesses
The delay in the full easing of lockdown restrictions and the knock on effect for certain tenants (particularly those in the hospitality and entertainment industry) has clearly caused a change of heart and the government has now announced a further extension of the restrictions.
Please note: the information contained in this legal update is correct as of the original date of publication.
We mentioned in our articles of 11 March (click here) and 8 April (click here) that the government was extending again until 30 June the various restrictions on landlords鈥 remedies that it has brought in since the pandemic began and had published a call for evidence setting out possible options for when those restrictions expire. At the time, it was anticipated that the restrictions would finally all end on 30 June 2021. However, the delay in the full easing of lockdown restrictions and the knock on effect for certain tenants (particularly those in the hospitality and entertainment industry) has clearly caused a change of heart and the government has now announced a further extension of the restrictions.
So, in summary:
- Until 25 March 2022, a landlord will not be able to forfeit (i.e. terminate) a business lease for non-payment of rent (and other sums due under a lease).
- Until 25 March 2022, a landlord will not be able to exercise the statutory procedure known as Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (or CRAR) (which allows a landlord to instruct an enforcement agent to take control of a tenant's goods and sell them to recover an equivalent value to the rent arrears outstanding) unless a minimum of 554 days鈥 net unpaid rent is outstanding. In effect, up until the September 2021 quarter day, this will prevent a landlord exercising CRAR even if a tenant has paid no rent since the March 2020 quarter day.
- Until 30 September 2021, a landlord will not be able to present a winding-up petition against its tenant on the basis of a statutory demand and will not be able to present a winding-up petition on any ground unless it has reasonable grounds for believing that coronavirus has not had a financial effect on the company (or that the debt issues would have arisen even if coronavirus had not had a financial effect on the company).
So what about the call for evidence? The government has announced that legislation will be brought in to give extra protection to those businesses that had to close during the pandemic once the current restrictions (which apply to all tenants) expire. Rent arrears built up during that time will be ring-fenced and the government expects landlords to make allowances for these ring-fenced arrears and to share the financial impact with their tenants (e.g. waiving some of the rent due or agreeing a longer-term repayment plan). Where the parties cannot reach agreement on this, they will have to submit to a legally binding arbitration process to resolve the conflict. This will be settled by a private arbitrator in accordance with guidelines to be set out in the legislation.
In its announcement, the government re-emphasises a constant message since the start of the pandemic that businesses who are able to pay rent must do so. In addition, it stresses that tenants affected by the pandemic should start paying rent as soon as they are permitted to open (rent which accrued due prior to March 2020 or after the date when a business was permitted to open will not be ring-fenced).
Whilst the government鈥檚 plans have already been welcomed by the hospitality sector, it is not clear at the moment exactly how the ring-fencing process will work. In particular, two recent cases have confirmed that, despite everything, tenants remain liable to pay rent that fell due during the pandemic (even if a landlord鈥檚 ability to enforce payment of that rent has been severely curtailed). Is the new process intended to undermine the effect of these two decisions (so, in effect, varying the parties鈥 primary lease obligations for the affected period) or will the ring-fencing process only apply to the exercise by landlords of their remedies for non-payment of rent during the affected period? No doubt the devil will be in the detail once the legislation is published.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
澳门六合彩资料
ASA bans 鈥渕isleading鈥 Huel and ZOE ads endorsed by Dragon鈥檚 Den Star
Opinion
Choose your words wisely: Balancing inclusivity and employees鈥 beliefs at work
Guide
Guidance for manufacturers of EVs and HEVs in the UK: ASA's non-exhaustive electric vehicle advertising guidance
澳门六合彩资料
(Deep)fake it till you make it? The ASA's role in regulating false celebrity endorsements
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 strengthens Irish Corporate team with appointment of Principal Associate James Byrne
澳门六合彩资料
The benefits of good governance in sport
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 to lead discussions on the future of real estate and infrastructure at this year鈥檚 UKREiiF 2024 event
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 acquires business of real estate practitioner Paul Taylor Solicitors
澳门六合彩资料
The Baltimore bridge collapse: One of the biggest losses in maritime insurance history?
澳门六合彩资料
Understanding the ICO's new fining guidance
澳门六合彩资料
Unravelling the challenges and opportunities in UK sports governance
澳门六合彩资料
ASA ruling on Calvin Klein FKA Twigs advertisement
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 successful for National Lottery in Court of Appeal
Opinion
Caregivers at work: Navigating new carer's leave regulations
Opinion
EHRC publishes new guidance on menopause and the workplace
Opinion
BBC personality wins appeal on IR35 status
澳门六合彩资料
Covid BI litigation (Autumn 2023): Insurance coverage disputes update
澳门六合彩资料
COP28 - how to limit and prepare for future climate change
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 advise Maven Equity Finance on investment in Traverse Associates
Press Release
Three strong restructuring and insolvency team join 澳门六合彩资料
Podcast
The real estate podcast: How AI and tech is changing real estate
澳门六合彩资料
How to negotiate better 鈥榞reen鈥 provisions in your leases
Opinion
The Metaverse's influence on real estate: Implications for commercial retail clients and law firms
Guide
How to manage retail sector supply contracts and avoid disputes
澳门六合彩资料
Utilising prime retail sites to improve the health of our nation
澳门六合彩资料
A new era of opportunity for high street regeneration?
Opinion
Practical points from High Court ruling that Tesco has infringed Lidl鈥檚 IP rights in its famous yellow circle logo
Press Release
Corporate dealmakers advise Sodexo Live! on its move to 100% stake in global sports, travel and hospitality provider STH
澳门六合彩资料
Pitfalls for retailers to avoid when offering access to 鈥榖uy now, pay later鈥 products
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料鈥檚 Manchester dealmakers advise Spatial Global on its acquisition of Heathrow based freight specialist Hollyport Logistics
Opinion
Supreme court rules on retail tenant's service charge bill
Published Article - Consumer Duty
Consumer duty part 3 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料鈥檚 retail lawyers advise Wilko on its strategic 拢48m sale and leaseback of Nottinghamshire distribution centre to DHL
Press Release
Suzanne Harlow joins 澳门六合彩资料 as Non-Executive Director
Law firm 澳门六合彩资料 is pleased to announce that Suzanne Harlow has been appointed Non-Executive Director of its Retail, Consumer & Logistics sector.
澳门六合彩资料
Fashion retailers: Is this the end for free returns?
Published Article
AI generated designs on retail products
Every AI will have its own terms of use. DALL路E 2鈥檚 Terms of Use dated 3 November 2022 specify that as between a user and Open AI, a user owns their prompts and uploads. Open AI also assigns to the user all rights in any images generated by DALL路E 2 for that user (subject to the user complying with those Terms of Use, and to a licence to use inputs and output to develop and improve the services).
Published Article - Consumer Duty
Consumer duty part 2 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
Published Article
Luxury brands and sustainability: The challenges and solutions
澳门六合彩资料
The Retained EU Law
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the 鈥淏ill鈥).