Reading policy wordings – the appliance of science
Reading on a screen is famously bad for our eyes and brains. From eyesight decline and headaches to interfering with sleep and even bad posture, the list of potential symptoms is long. Couple this with the technical complexity of many insurance policy wordings and you have a recipe for some potentially difficult reading.
Improving the reading experience for policyholders may be a key to improving a policyholder’s understanding and overall experience in understanding their policy.
In 2018, °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ and the University of Nottingham conducted an academic study into the readability of insurance policy wordings and found that there are many ways a policy can be made more readable. By making a number of tweaks to the language of policy wordings (including reducing sentence length, eliminating ‘low-frequency’ words and using pronouns, together with a number of other changes) it has been scientifically established that the readability of wordings can be greatly improved.
In addition to the use of language, there are many innovations relating to how text and information is actually presented, including a new method called Bionic Reading. An example of is shown below.
Bionic Reading aims to make it easier and quicker for readers to read a text through the use of innovating bolding – essentially by showing the first few letters of each word in bold font. The technique works on the theory that the human eye rarely reads an entire word, but rather looks at the first few letters together with the general shape of the word, and the brain ‘fills in the blanks’. This method is intended to help the brain in doing so.
Whether or not Bionic Reading takes off remains to be seen. However, it is clear that technological innovations such as Bionic Reading, eye-tracking analysis, smart documents and other techniques continue to develop apace. It will be interesting to see whether (and if so, when) insurers begin to adopt such techniques to help their customers better understand and navigate their policy wordings.
Our expertise
You may be interested in...
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Navigating workplace sexual harassment laws during the festive season
Opinion
Revolutionising the Workforce: Impact of Get Britain Working White Paper
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ - London Market Quarterly
London Market Quarterly December 2024: An eye on what the market needs to know
Published Article
Johnson et al v FirstRand Bank: Judgment sends warning across financial services intermediation
Opinion
Balancing employer flexibility and employee rights
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
The ‘grate’ cheese robbery: Implications for insurance professionals
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Environmental crime and the impact for insurers
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Carbon fraud prompts insurance response
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
What might a Trump victory mean for the UK insurance industry?
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Post Office scandal: Lessons for underwriters
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Weather protection parametric insurance: A sign of things to come?
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Building an inclusive workplace: strategies for attracting and retaining disabled talent
On-Demand
Kinship care: DJ v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and SG
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
After a pause, Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) regulation becomes one step closer
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Updates to the UK’s Arbitration Bill
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Ozempic: The rising costs and coverage issues of weight loss medication
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ - Employment Rights Bill
What does the Employment Rights Bill mean for employment practices liability insurance?
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
ICAEW: Changes to PII requirements
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Contractor insolvency: Peabody Trust v NHBC
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Insurability by design: Increased transparency for vehicle manufacturers and insurers
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
By a narrow 2 to 1 majority, the Court of Appeal finds in favour of insurers in the construction of an exclusion clause in a W&I policy
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Organisational approaches to ESG and sustainability matters
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Smooth sailing ahead: The LMA's new Open Form Default Clause
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
LMA binders’ consultation
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
PFAS: The issue that won’t go away
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Oklahoma earthquake: Racial discrimination in adjudication
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Will the Online Safety Act help reduce Google ad spoofing in insurance?
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Vicarious liability for kinship foster carer abuse: Implications for local authority insurers
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Latest short-term insurance trends
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Motor finance complaints on hold: Why now is the time for strategic action
Published Article
General insurance claims part 3: evidence of the insurance markets’ learnings from the consumer duty
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Artificial intelligence putting the ‘actuarial defence’ to the test?
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Under the influence: France introduces insurance requirement for influencers
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Insuring a summer of sport
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
The impact of UK riots on insurers
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ - The Word
The Word, August 2024
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Product Safety and Metrology Bill: E-bike and e-scooter fires
Opinion
Choose your words wisely: Balancing inclusivity and employees’ beliefs at work
Published Article - Consumer Duty
General insurance claims: The consumer duty’s easy target? (part 2: ‘a history of warnings’)
