The RAAC crisis: Is it really back-to-school this September?
As all readers will know, many schools have been deemed "" following the historic widespread use of Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC). Given a life span of around 30 years, RAAC has resulted in many public buildings from the 1950s to the 1990s being deemed to be structurally un-safe. This follows a spate of incidents, including one at a , where RAAC panels failed without warning.
To remove RAAC, extensive works must be undertaken by specialists to remove ceilings, which very often also include asbestos. This has prompted the outlining the funding of remedial or rebuilding works. The government has also confirmed it will pay for all capital costs, including for temporary accommodation.
Presently, because of RAAC. However, more may follow suit as the . James Porter, a building consultant, stated that the actual number of schools with RAAC is than those identified so far.
The full extent of the problem does not appear to be limited to schools. -based construction, with seven of these not fit for purpose beyond 2030.
Considerations for insurers
Despite remedial work and capital costs being covered for public buildings, it is unknown how efficiently this will be undertaken and to what is deemed as a reasonable capital cost. As such, Insurers may expect to see an increase in claims for additional costs. Further, with RAAC potentially affecting many other types of buildings, it is unknown whether the government will finance remedial work and capital costs in a similar fashion. As such, Insurers may want to review their property wordings to assess their current exposure, and whether suitable reserves are in place.
Insurers may also wish to undertake independent assessments of RAAC in insured properties or properties that are proposed for cover. In addition to the potential first party losses, insurers are reminded of the increased risk of injury in the event of building failure caused by RAAC.
Further articles on RAAC:
Contents
- The Word, September 2023
- Mind the GAP - FCA warning to GAP insurers
- Death and disgrace policies: What can insurers learn from the allegations against Russell Brand?
- Extreme weather leading to a rise in property claims
- A new digital safe space – How does the EU Digital Services Act affect insurers?
- Insurance and the Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018
- CyberCube’s Global Threat Outlook: The evolving threat of cyber operations
- “TOBA traps” - general exposure risk under existing TOBAs
- Making numbers easy - complying with the Customer Understanding objective
You may be interested in...
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
The ‘grate’ cheese robbery: Implications for insurance professionals
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Environmental crime and the impact for insurers
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
What might a Trump victory mean for the UK insurance industry?
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Post Office scandal: Lessons for underwriters
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Weather protection parametric insurance: A sign of things to come?
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Updates to the UK’s Arbitration Bill
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Ozempic: The rising costs and coverage issues of weight loss medication
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
ICAEW: Changes to PII requirements
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Contractor insolvency: Peabody Trust v NHBC
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
By a narrow 2 to 1 majority, the Court of Appeal finds in favour of insurers in the construction of an exclusion clause in a W&I policy
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Smooth sailing ahead: The LMA's new Open Form Default Clause
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
LMA binders’ consultation
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
PFAS: The issue that won’t go away
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Oklahoma earthquake: Racial discrimination in adjudication
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Vicarious liability for kinship foster carer abuse: Implications for local authority insurers
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Latest short-term insurance trends
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ - The Word
The Word, August 2024
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Words matter: Another case on the importance of accurate drafting
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
London Fire Brigade to stop attending for automatic fire alarms: Implications for insurers
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Navigating Oil Price Cap legislation: LMA issues revised Cargo and Hull wordings
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
It’s not cricket: Insurers change their mind about jurisdiction
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Multi-occupancy building insurance: Latest tribunal decision
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ - The Word
The Word, June 2024
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ - Consumer Duty
Updated UK Consumer Wordings Guidance: °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ collaborates with the LMA
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ - Consumer Duty
From products to protection: The rise of embedded insurance
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
The European Accessibility Act: Inclusive products and services
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Final FCA anti-greenwashing rule guidance published
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ - The Word
The Word, May 2024
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
The Baltimore bridge collapse: One of the biggest losses in maritime insurance history?
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
The space data revolution
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
New guidance on supporting autistic customers for the insurance industry
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Chubb ordered to indemnify SXSW for Covid cancellation
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ - The Word
The Word, March 2024
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Commercial Court considers requests for stay or anti-suit injunction where two competing reinsurance wordings
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Insurers prevail once more in construction of an exclusion clause in W&I policy
Opinion
Regulator warning on future dangers of asbestos
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
Parametric flood policies - Insurers no longer in uncharted waters?
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ
LockBit unlocked: °ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ taskforce takes down major cyber criminal organisation
°ÄÃÅÁùºÏ²Ê×ÊÁÏ - Consumer Duty
80% of GAP market pause sales amid Consumer Duty concerns
