Sky鈥檚 overly broad trade marks narrowed as found partially invalid for bad faith
Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick.
Lord Justice Arnold has applied the guidance of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to the evidence before him, in the long standing trade mark dispute between Sky and Skykick. The CJEU confirmed that a lack of intention to use part of a trade mark when registering it could amount to bad faith in relation to that part. However, it also suggested the circumstances when this would be the case were narrow and the evidential burden high.
However, the UK judge found that Sky had included in its registrations (a) items like "whips" it had no intention of using at all and (b) items described so broadly, Sky did not and could not intend to use them across their breadth (e.g. "computer services"). He ruled that Sky applied for these with "the intention of obtaining an exclusive right for purposes other than those falling within the functions of a trade mark, namely purely as a legal weapon against third parties". This was evidence of bad faith.
The outcome of this judgment for Sky, subject to any appeal, is that many items in its specifications are to be re-written in much narrower terms.
Skykick's defence in relation to Sky's registration for "electronic mail services" depended on invalidity for lack of clarity or the whole mark in issue being invalid for partial bad faith; which the CJEU had ruled out. Skykick was therefore found to infringe this.
Going forward this decision is likely to mean that:
- including items which are very obviously inconsistent with any sensible commercial strategy of the business that is making a UK trade mark application is not advisable
- including very broad terms, particularly computer services, in a UK trade mark application is now more likely to meet objections from the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) increasing filing costs and delay, so such terms may also not be included so frequently
- UKIPO and EUIPO/EU27 filing strategies will gradually start to diverge
- trade mark infringement actions, particularly in the UK, will frequently be met with Skykick invalidity arguments, therefore these issues should be considered when devising enforcement strategies
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 advises retail giant The Range on its acquisition of Homebase
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 advises Clean Power Hydrogen on global IP licence agreement
澳门六合彩资料
The EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)
澳门六合彩资料
Breaking the glass ceiling: Empowering female leadership in the food and drink sector
澳门六合彩资料
IP insights: October 2024
澳门六合彩资料
CJEU confirms that copyright law is the same for all claimants
澳门六合彩资料
Court of Appeal declares that Panasonic鈥檚 refusal to grant an interim licence is not FRAND
澳门六合彩资料
EasyGroup proceedings defeated by jurisdictional challenge
澳门六合彩资料
Insurability by design: Increased transparency for vehicle manufacturers and insurers
澳门六合彩资料
Navigating the waters of compliance: Understanding the Trade, Aircraft, and Shipping Sanctions (Civil Enforcement) Regulations 2024
Training
Register your interest to join our next Home Delivery Academy
Opinion
Forced labour goods: a landmark decision
澳门六合彩资料
ASA bans 鈥渕isleading鈥 Huel and ZOE ads endorsed by Dragon鈥檚 Den Star
Guide
Guidance for manufacturers of EVs and HEVs in the UK: ASA's non-exhaustive electric vehicle advertising guidance
Opinion
New hope for the manufacturing sector?
Guide
EU Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act: Guide for your business
澳门六合彩资料
(Deep)fake it till you make it? The ASA's role in regulating false celebrity endorsements
Press Release
Jeanne Kelly recognised in the list of Top 100 people in Irish Tech by the Business Post
Press Release
New resource will support university innovation
澳门六合彩资料
A reflection of FIMA Connect 2024
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 wins UK Impact Case of the Year at the Managing IP EMEA Awards 2024
澳门六合彩资料
Forest Risk Commodities regulations: Steps food businesses should take
澳门六合彩资料
Cyber-attacks in UK universities: Why failing to prepare is no longer an option
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 Ireland LLP rank across Dispute Resolution, Intellectual Property and Technology in the Legal 500 EMEA 2024
澳门六合彩资料
Artificial intelligence 鈥 shaping a sustainable future
澳门六合彩资料
ASA ruling on Calvin Klein FKA Twigs advertisement
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料鈥檚 intellectual property lawyers ranked in World Trademark Review 2024
澳门六合彩资料
Veganism and manufacturing: IP protection
澳门六合彩资料
Veganism and manufacturing: Advertising pitfalls
澳门六合彩资料
The rise of AI in construction
澳门六合彩资料
An update on the independent review of university spin-out companies
On-Demand
Copyright issues with AI webinar
Published Article
The reasons for asset-based lending鈥檚 growing acceptance as a preferred funding source
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料鈥檚 patent litigation team praised for being 鈥渄ynamic鈥 and a 鈥渕ajor player鈥 in IAM Patent 1000 guide
澳门六合彩资料
Harnessing the potential of knowledge exchange, research and innovation
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料 advise on international sale of entertainment company Music For Pets
Opinion
Practical points from High Court ruling that Tesco has infringed Lidl鈥檚 IP rights in its famous yellow circle logo
澳门六合彩资料
Knowledge exchange and intellectual property
Press Release
澳门六合彩资料鈥檚 intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
Press Release
Court of Appeal makes plea for legally enforceable arbitration for FRAND disputes
In the ongoing complex litigation between Optis Cellular Technology LLC and Apple Inc., the Court of Appeal ([2022] EWCA Civ 1411) has upheld the High Court鈥檚 findings that implementers of standard-essential patents (SEPs) cannot refuse to accept a FRAND license and continue activities in the meantime which constitute infringement: that party must commit to accept a court-determined license if it wishes to avoid an injunction.